r284 ecopia vs xline energy z rolling resistance

#R284 ecopia vs xline energy z rolling resistance full

Goodyear’s LHT and Michelin’s X Line Energy T tire. Goodyear’s G505D LHD and Michelin’s X Line Energy D tire and Bridgestone’s R123 Trailer Tire vs. Disclaimer: Comparison based on Bridgestone R284 Ecopia Steer tire vs Goodyear’s LHS and Michelin’s X Line Energy Z tire Bridgestone’s M713 Drive Tire vs. Bridgestone M710 Ecopia tire from internal testing. Comparison based on Bridgestone M713 Ecopia tire vs. and Canada, with sizes 295.75R24.5 and 11R24.5 available by March 1, 2020.įor more information on the Bridgestone M713 Ecopia tire and other Ecopia products for every wheel position and application, please visit. The new Bridgestone M713 Ecopia tire is now available in size 295/75R22 and 11R22.5 in the U.S. For example, combining the Bridgestone R284 Ecopia steer tire, the Bridgestone M713 Ecopia drive tire and the Bridgestone R123 Ecopia trailer tire can help long haul fleet customers save up to $2,169 in fuel costs versus Michelin and $2,130 versus Goodyear. Three-Peak Mountain Snowflake (3PMSF) certification for winter traction performance.įleets that use Bridgestone Ecopia tires in all three wheel positions may experience the Ecopia Effect™.A continuous shoulder design to uniformly distribute weight and torque to prevent irregular wear and.A high-rigidity tread pattern to control movement of the tire’s tread blocks for less wear and lower rolling resistance.An optimized belt package for casing durability and reduced tire weight 1.3D siping to provide 130% more- biting edges, which help increase traction across many road and weather conditions.Other features of the Bridgestone M713 Ecopia tire include: The tire also leverages a proprietary Fuel Saver Sidewall compound and patented NanoPro-Tech polymer technology to reduce energy loss, helping to enhance fuel economy 1. The Bridgestone M713 Ecopia tire features several design advancements for improved fuel efficiency, including an IntelliShape sidewall that reduces overall tire weight to minimize rolling resistance 1. “The Bridgestone M713 Ecopia tire is uniquely designed to increase tread life and significantly reduce rolling resistance for the long-haul and regional service fleets that we rely on, every day.” and Canada, Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations (BATO).

#R284 ecopia vs xline energy z rolling resistance full

“Bridgestone is committed to making mobility more efficient for fleets, which is why we’ve equipped the Bridgestone Ecopia tire line with our most fuel-efficient and sustainable offerings to help fleets capitalize on the full performance potential of their valuable tire assets,” said Ben Johnson, marketing director, truck and bus radial tires, U.S.

In addition, the tire casing is specifically designed to pair with a fuel-efficient Bandag FuelTech retread to help extend tire life and further lower the total cost of tire ownership. (Bridgestone) today announced the release of the all new Bridgestone M713 Ecopia tire, a SmartWay ® verified and California Air Resources Board (CARB) compliant drive tire for tandem-axel applications in long-haul and regional service.Įngineered with proprietary compounds and an innovative design, the Bridgestone M713 Ecopia tire offers fleets enhanced performance through an 8% improvement in rolling resistance and a 15% longer tread life 1. (4) Internal 2012 study on MICHELIN X® LINE™ ENERGY™ Z 315/70 R22.5 tyres compared to MICHELIN X® ENERGY™ SAVERGREEN™ XF 315/70 R22.5 tyres.Bridgestone Americas, Inc. (3) Internal 2016 calculation: fuel savings up to 2.5 litres/100 km for new tyres and 1.25 litres/100 km on average for the 1st life of tyres with a tractor/tractor-trailer ensemble with a cargo load of 40 tonnes equipped with MICHELIN X® LINE™ ENERGY™ Z 295 / 60 R22.5 or 315 / 60 R22.5, MICHELIN X® LINE™ ENERGY™ D 295 / 60 R22.5 and MICHELIN X® LINE™ ENERGY™ T 445 / 45 R19.5 compared to a tractor-trailer/tractor ensemble with a cargo load of 40 tonnes equipped with MICHELIN X® ENERGY™ XF 295 / 60 R22.5 or 315 / 60 R22.5, MICHELIN XDA2 + Energy 295 / 60 R22.5, and MICHELIN XTA2 + ENERGY™ T 445 / 45 R19.5 tyres (rolling resistance reduced by 26%). Internal comparison carried out at the Michelin research and development centre by comparing the average weight of MICHELIN REMIX™ tyres with the average weight of new MICHELIN tyres in several sizes.

(2) MICHELIN REMIX retreading requires, on average, only 20 kg of additional raw materials, which comes out to a savings of 50 kg in raw materials when compared to the production of a new MICHELIN tyre. (1) Internal simulation between a tractor-trailer/tractor ensemble equipped with MICHELIN X® LINE™ ENERGY™ tyres compared with a tractor-trailer/tractor ensemble equipped with regrooved MICHELIN X® LINE™ ENERGY™ tyres.